Marketing is sick, Sales is dead
Posted on March 3rd, 2010 by Paul McArdle – 5 CommentsFood for thought, this morning, when I trundled along to a breakfast event hosted by the AMI, featuring Dr Don E Schultz of Agora fame, and author of a number of books (none of which, it would seem, we have previously added to our shopping cart).
Don’s main thesis is that:
1) The “modern” approach to marketing emerged in parallel with the industrial age of society, and hence is based on similar principles (e.g. a Taylorist view of the world – which leads into a “command and control” focus internally, and a top-down mentality in terms of push-based marketing to “consumers” (how I hate that term).
2) Given that we’re progressing from this Industrial Age into what’s been termed by a number of people as a “Customer Age”, Don’s view is that marketing also needs a transformation.
Don talked quickly through five aspects of this transformation.
The following is my re-creation of Don’s points based on my scratchings during the event:
Transformation #1 Marketing at the Speed of Customers, not Competitors
Most of what has been taught at universities, and is still in most books about marketing, is premised on a top-down view of marketing and sales
i.e. build a widget, and then find people to sell it to
Hence, principles such as the 4P’s (sometimes extrapolated to 5 or 6) are dated concepts based in an old paradigm.
My view is that this does not necessarily make them worthless - just dangerous, if used without reference to context.
In contrast, Don talked about how the companies that will prosper in the future start with working out what the customer wants in the first place (seems simple, I know).
Don talked about how the iPhone was an example of a product was one in which the manufacturer worked in collaboration with users (through the iStore) to flesh out the scope of the “whole product” (as described by Geoffrey Moore).
This reminds me of Lars’ description of how the development of content for Google Maps was effectively outsourced to the users of the service, as well.
From our point of view, this is very much the reason why our “GM Software” (which we are recruiting now) has a title which explicitly incorporates discerning what the customer wants as a core responsibility.
In summary – stop focusing on the competition, start interacting with your customers.
Transformation #2 Marketing at the Speed of Listening, not Talking
Don’s main thesis is that sales has traditionally been viewed as a linear, push-dominated process (e.g. a “sales funnel”).
In my view, this has the effect of creating a false impression (within a Marketing Department) that they have more control over the message the customer hears and how they respond. In my view this was never really the case, and it is increasingly becoming less tenable.
In some staid industries (such as the electricity supply industry, in which we operate) traditional sellers have been able to live that way to this point in time.
In our industry, the government’s $100M “Smart Grid, Smart City” project, we very much would like to see this high-profile project as a way in which the industry experiments with ways to move to a more bottom-up mode of interacting with end-use customers.
Our company has been active in progressing this transformation at the large-end of energy-use (with industrial energy users) and will progressively look for opportunities through which we can also do this with smaller customers, as well.
Hence, when we go out to talk to customers, our focus should be on listening to what they want to tell us, not asking them what we (think we) want to know.
Transformation #3 Use consumer consumption, rather than communication distribution
Here Don was mainly talking about changing the way that media/marketing companies measure the reach of the messages they promote – given everyone increasingly multi-tasks (in terms of how they consume media) measuring minutes of usage of a particular media channel is a misleading indicator.
Transformation #4 Speed up marketing with predictive models
What’s the point of measuring the effectiveness of money already invested (wasted?) on marketing?
Given a choice, it would be far more effective to work out ways in which to more effectively prioritise money that is yet to be invested into the most effective communication channels.
Don says that no-one has really nailed this one, yet (hence we’re betting on the next horse race based on who we bet on last time - without even really knowing if that horse won the last race).
Transformation #5 Get rid of silos – customer focus is cross-functional
I agree entirely.
This is why the leadership team I am establishing internally will all have explicit responsibility for some touch-point with the customer.
Given we will be kicking off recruitment of a “General Manager for Customer Relationships” (aka GM M&S) shortly, we will be giving these type of ideas much more focused thought….
I found this very interesting, and agreeable.
The ‘upside’ to software (in comparison to the iPhone for example) is that it’s easier to provide an upgrade path for existing customers to move to the ‘new stuff’ while marketing at the speed of customers. (rather than having to go and buy a new iPhone)
The value of listening and the proving that you have listened is huge. Being able to then pick up existing customers and move them to the ‘new stuff’ is just awesome for the customer.
Thanks Adrian,
As you know, one of the driving reasons for our move to agile (no tattoo) is to embed the customer squarely in the middle of our product development process.
This will be done a variety of different ways:
1) For an existing mature product (such as NEM-Watch, for instance, which is focused on delivering clarity), we know what it’s core value proposition is for the customer, and we also have a large number of customers. Hence the process is somewhat more straightforward.
2) For new products for new markets, where we don’t have current clients and have only an idea of what the value proposition might be, we will have to be smart about rapid prototyping - and doing so in a way that will garner us plenty of feedback.
Cheers
Paul
In my experience just listening to the basic gripes (and also positive ideas) of clients, and showing you are doing something about them, puts you well ahead of the pack in terms of service. The client gets such a sense of ownership when involved that it is very rewarding for them. It is sad to see how many firms are incapable of even listening to their customers, let alone actively engaging with them; I would say it is likely to be the vast majority.
I wouldn’t use the iPhone as an example there myself - I just upgraded my iPhone OS and all the software on it is fully upgradeable. The item itself is hardware, and of course any hardware can only be upgraded if it is component based, and unfortunately phones often are designed not to be upgraded
Thanks Chris,
As you know, we want to go way past “the pack”.
Instead of focusing on who our current competitors are now, I am more focused on who they might be in 5 years or less.
With all the big boys jumping into the energy space by virtue of the “smart grid” (whatever that actually turns out to be) I believe it will be a very different landscape in a short period of time…
Paul
Good to be in there first! No need to be worried about the big boys either, even the largest most organised firms generally use only small teams performing agile development, and so it is easily possible to stay out in front if you have a focus on both the customer and rapid delivery.