Innovation

Growth Options for ICT Entrepreneurs

Posted in 01 - Leadership & Management, Event Review, Innovation on June 11th, 2008 by Paul McArdle2 Comments

.

The Information Industries Bureau (IIB) supported by the Australian Institute for Commercialisation (AIC), staged a one day seminar for executives of Queensland’s fastest growing ICT companies on Wednesday 11 June 2008 at Hillstone, St Lucia Golf Club.

The ‘Growth Options for ICT Entrepreneurs’ seminar was attended by about 90 invited guests who were informed and entertained by some of Australia’s most successful ICT entrepreneurs.

I was one of the attendees.  Will eventually get around to back-filling the details, in the meantime this page will be a part-finished place-holder.

.

read more »

Book Review: 10 Rules for Strategic Innovators

Posted in Book Review, Innovation on January 19th, 2008 by Paul McArdle1 Comment

.

Read this book back in 2007, and wish I had read it earlier – would have saved some heartache!

The post date for this article is not totally a lie – I presented this review at our first shareholders meeting (19th January 2008), which followed the renewal process we underwent in late 2007.

Binary Review

Certainly worth the read:

The Book

What we thought

10rulesforstrategicinnovators
10 Rules for Strategic Innovators
by Vijay Govindarajan
and Chris Trimble
Thumbs upNot perfect, but
it’s worth a read
Full Disclosure – yes, that’s a tracked link to Amazon shown above.

We buy quite a large number of books on a wide range of topics, all relevant to our business in some way.  If you did happen to purchase the book from Amazon, they’d throw a few shekels our way, which would help us to buy (and hence publish reviews of) even more books.  Hence, Karma would return the benefits to you…

This book is not perfect, but was (when I read it) confirmation of some of the gut feelings I had about some of the things we had been doing wrong in our business.

The core points in the book:

The basic principles are as follows:

Principle 1)  There are two distinctly different types of company:

(a)  Company A type are established companies, where the outcomes for the next year can be thought of as “Current + X%”.  With this in mind, management can be focused in a particular way – all about efficiencies, etc…

(b)  In complete contrast, Company B type (the authors label them “Strategic Experiments”) have a very uncertain future.  Start-ups are one type, and spin-offs another.

Principle 2)  The book then delves into the world of Strategic Experiments (NewCo) launched within established businesses (CoreCo) and, after talking through a couple of case studies, concludes that NewCo must do the following three things:

(a)  Forget (e.g. find its own culture, which is best done if it is physically separate from CoreCo)

(b)  Borrow (e.g. borrow the core expertise of CoreCo, which is best done if it is close by CoreCo).

(c)  Learn quickly (by a process of stating hypothesis, testing, refining hypothesis, etc…)

Principle 3)  The book then makes a telling point – that performance appraisal in Strategic Experiments should be:

(a)  Focused on how quickly NewCo learns from the market response, then adjusts its theories in the light on new information –

(b)  Definitely NOT on how closely it meets its targets.

Having been through the process in the early years of the company of (very much so) being a “Strategic Experiment”, I would certainly have liked to have read this book beforehand – and, as a result, not been so obsessed with targets that were total guesses in any case.

Book Review: Crossing the Chasm

Posted in 01 - Leadership & Management, 03 - Product Development, Book Review, Innovation, Marketing on January 19th, 2008 by Paul McArdle9 Comments

.

This book review was one of 3 book reviews I presented in our first shareholder’s meeting of 2008 (back in 19th January 2008).  Hence, I have used artistic licence with the post date to put this into context.

Binary Review

This book was originally published in 1991 but was revolutionary in explaining how to market (and plan the development of) innovative products (specifically high tech) :

The Book

What we thought

CrossingTheChasm
Crossing the Chasm
by Geoffrey A Moore
Thumbs up

An excellent book, that’s well worth reading

Full Disclosure – yes, that’s a tracked link to Amazon shown above.

We buy quite a large number of books on a wide range of topics, all relevant to our business in some way.  If you did happen to purchase the book from Amazon, they’d throw a few shekels our way, which would help us to buy (and hence publish reviews of) even more books.  Hence, Karma would return the benefits to you…

.

I continue to refer back to this book, despite having read and re-read it.

The underlying premise:

The book starts with the typical bell-shaped curve of customer adoption of any particular product, but argues it is a little different for the high-tech industry – in that there is a chasm between the two distinct parts of the market:

The Early Market (being enthusiasts and visionaries); and

The Mainstream Market (being pragmatists, conservatives and visionaries).

To often, the author notes, tech companies are encouraged by some early successes with the early adopters, and hence scale up too soon, expecting the J-curve to arrive, only to find themselves walking in the wilderness, looking for a beachhead into the pragmatists.

The book presents a whole load of information that’s useful – the following is what I summarised for our management meeting in January 2008:

1)  Seed new technology with enthusiasts (i.e. give it to the geeks, who will test it out for you and find the bugs) so they can help you to educate the visionaries (e.g. who are business people who will risk something that is unproven in order to win big)

2)  Once you have captured the visionaries’ interest, do whatever it takes to delight them, as they will serve as reference customers for the pragmatists.

BEWARE the chasm in between - we need to cross by choosing a targeted beachhead

3)  Gain the bulk of your revenue by serving the pragmatists – by becoming the market leader, and establishing defacto standards.  At this stage, the “whole product” is important.

4)  Leverage success with the pragmatists to generate volume so that the products are reliable/cheap enough to satisfy the conservatives.

5)  Don’t waste your time trying to sell to the sceptics BUT listen to what they say, as they may have valid points!

Even though we operate in a relatively narrow vertical market, this logic aligns with what we have found in the past – and we’re looking to learn from this to make our business expansion easier in future.

Hope this helps you, too!

Not a panacea for implementing a “Blue Ocean Strategy”

Posted in Book Review, Innovation on December 31st, 2006 by Paul McArdle1 Comment

.

We need to be innovative (but who doesn’t?).  We’ve had some successes in growing our company since 2000 in doing just that – though we’re just starting on the journey.

Given that this book has been feted in various circles as “the best thing since sliced cheese mousetraps”, we were keen to have a look

1) Binary Review

… however I was underwhelmed!

The Book

What we thought

BlueOceanStrategy
“Blue Ocean Strategy”
by
W Chan Kim &
Renee Mauborgne
thumbs-downI don’t recommend it
Full Disclosure – yes, that’s a tracked link to Amazon shown above. We buy quite a large number of books on a wide range of topics, all relevant to our business in some way. If you did happen to purchase the book from Amazon, they’d throw a few shekels our way, which would help us to buy (and hence publish reviews of) even more books. Hence, Karma would return the benefits to you…

read more »

Value Engineering (Value Management) Studies

Posted in 01 - Leadership & Management, CEO's Philosophy, Innovation on January 1st, 1994 by Paul McArdle2 Comments

.

For a start, I must note that I was never personally involved in any of these specifically-tailored study projects.

Rather, my understanding of them has come primarily from the time I spent at Gladstone Power Station during the sale process in 1994, when I spent a number of months stuck in the Data Room, reviewing documents as part of the Due Diligence process.

My job, during that period, revolved around reviewing pretty much all the documentation held onsite, determining what could, and could not, be released for the bidders to peruse.  As such, I spent many hours pouring over documentation relating to many aspects of the station, and quizzing the 2 senior engineers in the room if I did not understand something.

Any errors in my understanding (of course) are due to my own stupidity, and not due to explanations provided by others… read more »